Thursday, August 21st, 2008
UPDATED: A Follow Up On Payments
Timing, they say, is everything. I had no idea 3 months ago, when I booked my European trip, that we would be announcing these key changes to the eBay Marketplace this same week. On top of that, the two-day period when I’m celebrating the marriage of my little (not so little anymore I guess at 24) cousin, comes less than 24 hours after the news is announced. So I apologize for that now.
Additionally, I must thank the eBay folks back in San Jose, who, on top of everything else they’re working on, have jumped into the comments and are responding to questions and concerns right here on the blog and it’s great to see that happen. More of that in the future, I say… Inspiring stuff!
Having said all of that, I did want to take some time though to re-emphasize exactly what changes are being made with regard to payments and why those changes are taking place. I thought the microsite and other communication platforms were pretty clear but I do feel, as we have eclipsed the 100+ mark in the comments section of the previous post, that we have started to lose focus on exactly what the changes are. Particularly when talking about paying on eBay.
So, I wanted to share a few things with you. A couple of slides to show your new and improved actual buying and selling experience with the payments actually integrated into the eBay checkout process; a video featuring eBay’s one and only Griff; and a link to more information regarding the changes to payments on the eBay site that combined show why using electronic payments (and no, NOT JUST PAYPAL) makes for a better buyer and seller experience on the site. eBay will give buyers a faster, more secure checkout experience every time they pay, like other ecommerce sites. The goal is to keep them on eBay, purchasing your items. Period.
Finally, here is some more information regarding the payment changes:
http://pages.ebay.com/sell/August2008Update/Payments/
Cheers,
RBH
UPDATE: 8/25/08
Hi guys,
It’s getting a little late here in Germany but several of you have raised questions with how the payments changes will be enforced. We understand this is an important issue for sellers who have significant numbers of long-standing buyers who pay with checks or money orders. I know you are concerned both with losing buyers and with how eBay will enforce the changes. As a result, I followed up with the team in San Jose to get answers to your questions.
First, a seller can accept check and money order payment from a buyer if (and only if) the buyer requests it. We will not take action against a seller who is trying to accommodate their buyer, complete a sale and be in compliance with the policy. A seller can also decide to refuse check or money order payment from a buyer.
When these changes go into effect in late October, a seller cannot in any way solicit check or money order payment from a buyer. This is considered “abuse of the payments policy”. We will take action against such abuse. One way we will detect abuse is from reports from buyers. We will also monitor checkout completion rates for sellers, and this has generated a lot of questions from sellers. Here are some clarifications:
* eBay will not automatically take action against a seller with a low completion rate. We realize that there are many valid reasons for low completion rates, including the one raised by @Amber, who posted that she frequently uses PayPal invoices with her buyers. (We are reviewing the checkout flow with an eye towards determining and eliminating the most common reasons a seller is forced to resort to PayPal invoicing for eBay sales.)
* We will investigate sellers with low checkout completion rates on a case by case basis. Specifically, we will check to see if the seller is soliciting check or money order payment from their buyers. If we don’t find any evidence of this occurring, we won’t take action against the seller.
eBay also plans to help you retain your buyers. We are planning a series of workshops, blogs and email to buyers to provide tips on how to adjust to the changes, and assure them of both the security of the new eBay checkout and the permitted electronic payment options, as well as overall benefits to paying using electronic methods, such as buyer protection. Late last week, eBay began a phone outreach campaign targeted at top buyers who frequently use checks and money orders. These buyers were offered coupons to encourage them to continue purchasing your items.
I hope this answers a number of your questions.
Cheers,
RBH
Related Reads:
* Changes on eBay: The Impact of Eliminating Paper
Tagged: ebay, ebayink, payments, PayPal
DakotaOn August 21, 2008 at 1:52 pm Said:
One of my unanaswered questions from the other thread where eBay is dumping all buyers who use checks or money orders (the thread is not off the mark – go check it out – there are many relelvant posts and more unanswered questions):
Clarification is needed after going to the boards. I read the policy to say NO checks or money orders but on one of the boards, the following is posted:
From the above thread posted by Pinkie “Lulu” – “Hello wizard,
We realize that some customers may ask to pay with a check or money order. While we prefer buyers pay with online payments, it is fine for sellers to accept checks or money orders upon the buyers request.
Best,
Lulu”
—
Right. But let’s be crystal clear here: Seller are free to accept any payment type request a buyer might send them but post October, they will not be able to offer the option of checks or money orders in their listings or their email to buyers.
Griff
—
j-t*
Griff, can sellers then put a note in their listings for the buyer to contact them to use other payment methods not listed without saying what type?
- JT
pepinski9
Or can we say in our email to buyers contact us for other methods accepted or please let us know your preferred payment method…..
No.
Sellers will not be permitted to solicit paper payments in any way shape or form. Email, listing descriptions, etc. A seller will not be permitted to solicit buyers with a “please let us know your preferred payment method” email. If the buyer reports the seller and provides the email, the seller will risk sanctions.
Griff
****
Ok, which is it? Checks and money orders – yes, no or only under certain circumstances?
Yet a seller has to worry about the eBay police monitoring their activities and risk sanctions.
We need a 100% clear cut answer please.
DakotaOn August 21, 2008 at 1:55 pm Said:
Are there going to be seperate threads to deal with the other issues in the latest policy change?
There are many unanswered questions on the other thread about all aspects of the new policy.
They are need answers.
DaveyOn August 21, 2008 at 2:18 pm Said:
I’m still waiting to hear how eBay will align its electronic payment arm to address those things that do not currently “delight” its customers, namely very poor customer service when it comes to solving problems, unreliable availability of the platform for both accepting payments and for fulfulling orders, failure of promotional discount coupons, delays in clearing payment forms, and the list goes on. I’ve heard a lot of “you will’s” directed at sellers, but very few “we will’s” to address long-term shortcomings of the platforms we are now being forced to use for all practical purposes. A few commitments from Paypal are long overdue.
DawnOn August 21, 2008 at 2:19 pm Said:
Prohibiting checks and money orders is a bad idea, period. It’s bad for buyers, and it’s bad for sellers. As has been stated over and over, buyers who refuse or are unable to pay with an electronic payment are just not going to buy on eBay any longer. It’s just that simple.
As for sellers, those who do not accept PayPal for financial reasons have not been given a viable option. If they don’t make enough profit to be able to afford PayPal fees, how are they going to pay higherProPay fees or merchant account discount rates? They aren’t. Again, it’s a no-brainer.
I’m all for a faster, easier checkout system. But there is no valid reason not to include options for check and money order payments in the super duper new system. I have those options in the checkout system on my website. Why can’t eBay include them on theirs?
And, I agree with Dakota that there were many other (more important, IMO) changes announced yesterday that need to be addressed specifically.
LurchOn August 21, 2008 at 3:16 pm Said:
Didn’t know about the microsite. It states this: “Also, auction-style listings continue to receive great visibility in search because they are sorted based on time ending soonest. Auctions will always have a place on eBay.”
How come I always get a sort of Best Match?
TonyOn August 21, 2008 at 3:25 pm Said:
The good part of this is the checkout with credit card payment, that’s a vast improvement and should be welcomed by all who offer that option.
The responses in the previous post were also most welcome, even though some of those guys got a hard time it was nice to see more reps posting.
I’m a bit bemused as to why the seller who thinks cheques and money orders are time consuming thinks the buyers who use those options will happily switch to paperless payments. There’s a high probability they won’t buy from her at all…although I guess that will free up more of her time too.
I don’t understand why ebay are so hellbent on reducing consumer choice on this issue. Some people simply don’t like putting their credit or bank details on the internet, they will choose to shop elsewhere, who does that benefit?
EricOn August 21, 2008 at 3:29 pm Said:
Thank you for showing the mockups of the new eBay checkout options. How will “the payment will be routed to the seller’s Internet merchant account”? This integration is key to moving towards a unified checkout. I talked with my eBay top seller account manager and he didn’t know the answer. I find the announcement is long on the what and why of the changes while short on the how things will work.
I strongly discourage eBay to use a payment gateway like ProPay to integrate the credit card payments. Usually Internet merchant accounts will only accept charges from trusted sources (IP addresses) which are determined when you setup the account. I don’t see how eBay will insert themselves as a trusted source in every merchant’s Internet merchant account. The only way I see this happening is with a payment gateway. Then this puts the costly development work on the sellers for eBay’s decision.
This is how I see it working for sellers.
eBay Checkout -> Payment Gateway??? -> Seller Secure Site -> Internet Merchant Account -> Customer’s Credit Card
DakotaOn August 21, 2008 at 4:38 pm Said:
Why do my posts keep getting held up?
This is crud.
If I write more than a few lines, it takes MANY hours to post.
I guess my thousands and thousands in eBay fees each year ($5000 – $8000 on the high end during the holidays each month)are not any more mportant here than they are to eBay on the actual site – the only ones (and their opinions) that matter at eBay is the big dogs themselves.
I get little services for the buck on the site and here – I get censored. What a sham!
LurchOn August 21, 2008 at 4:42 pm Said:
Usher – thanks for the, um, clarification? It’s good to hear that soon “Ending Soonest” will be the default sort again, but it’s definitely not now (can’t tell if you’re trying to say it is). You have to choose it from the drop-down menu sort menu. Unless ending in 6 hours is supposed to be sandwiched between 4 and 6 days. For example (that was one of many on a short results search I just did).
BTW: people getting the login/password prompt – it may be if you forgot to enter a name and email. I just did, tried to submit and got the login/password. That’s an odd way to handle required fields.
Patricia1On August 21, 2008 at 5:28 pm Said:
Sorry Mr. Lieberman but its clear as mud to me :-( I guess we’re going to have to actually see it in action.
MechelleOn August 21, 2008 at 6:03 pm Said:
You guys can’t even get search right with the current model how are you going to manage adding another component? The glitches in eBay right now are by far more common than not.
The little boo boo when you guys were rigging DSRs for the 15th invoice caused a lot of problems for people- yes I know eBay tried to tell everyone that it was only the view not the search- but I don’t believe that for a second unless the DSRs actually have nothing to do with search???
The new store listing glitch giving people a message the item had been removed by eBay- you messed that up too, and how many sells where lost because of that top notch tech programming
Double listing – not listing – gone missing listings
What does eBay pay these people minimum wage???
You play all these games with our lives and s…w up constantly- no apologies, no restitution, no explanations to our customers.
So next week they’ll be forcing people to participate in eBay’s new search failure to view listings that are a mess and utterly worthless for the hope of multiple purchases. Where is the ethics in this company?? Can’t you ask people to participate? Do you always feel it necessary to strong arm everyone into doing what you want?? Pathetic
And why are you hiding the new pages with all the new features from sellers? These are their listings that they pay for and you are manipulating them and hiding your manipulations from the sellers who own those listings.
I ask again, does eBay see we are people?? Do you not realize that we have families to support, mortgages to pay, and food to buy?? What type of character would play such games with peoples lives.
I am stunned at the decrease in sells I have had this year. I am almost 1/2 less in gross sales this year relative to last year.
Someone called live chat today, because they have noticed a severe decline in their traffic reports and the rep asked her what suggestion she would like?? Of course she asked what? and the rep informed her that there is a link issue and the other day they were getting a lot of complaints so they were given a list of generic BS to feed us as to why are traffic is dead. What is that? You can’t inform us when your glitches have caused us a loss??
Patricia1On August 21, 2008 at 6:36 pm Said:
Hmmm…well, to simplify things why not separate them and have two tabs on the listing page – one for auctions and one for fixed price. That would not only keep the two searches and the two types of listings separate but it would also tell you which the buyers prefer :-)
DakotaOn August 21, 2008 at 7:17 pm Said:
Does anyone on this blog truly believe that it is nothing more than another promotional tool for the site?
Do all that come here truly believe the eBayspeak that goes on here?
When a thread gets too heated, they move on as if it never happened.
There were lots of questions in the last thread that were left unanswered.
Is this really acceptable to those that come here with hopes of a real answer?
I say NO!
Patricia1On August 21, 2008 at 10:35 pm Said:
I think as long as this blog is here and Richard is allowing us plenty of leeway to speak our minds then there is always hope of getting a point or two across. I never give up that hope. I’ve been on ebay a long time and up till this year it was pretty profitable for me. Me and countless other small sellers are still hopeful that things will turn for the better because we don’t want to lose the site we helped to build. So, you can say whatever you wish – I still believe in being civil and if I can’t do that then I’d rather walk away. I personally have had only one post of mine deleted here and I lost my head and Richard was right to delete it. You all have plenty to say and plenty of good solid points to bring out. Don’t give up on this blog….its the only place we can even speak to some of these people.
Cliff AlipertiOn August 21, 2008 at 11:11 pm Said:
I think I’ve got a pretty good grip of what the new default search will look like, but I’m curious if it will be the default or the only search option. In other words, will we still have the “Sort by” dropdown at the top of search results and the “Search Options” box at the left. Will we be able to search all listings by “Ending Soonest” or “Newly Listed” if we wish to veer away from the default…or will the default by the only way to search.
Thank you,
Cliff
DakotaOn August 22, 2008 at 2:18 am Said:
Patricia,
I know understand what you are saying about the blog and Richard. By no means am I disrespecting Richard.
What I do think is that he and the rest of us have been blinded by the hopes of making a difference.
You said:
So, you can say whatever you wish – I still believe in being civil and if I can’t do that then I’d rather walk away. I personally have had only one post of mine deleted here and I lost my head and Richard was right to delete it.
I was civil, all I did is re-ask one of my questions that was on the other thread that went unanswered there (and took 24 hours to post on that thread also).
If that is not “civil” or proper in the eyes of the blog police, then this blog has been more misrepresented than I knew. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the post for it to be tied up in Ink pergatory.
You said:
its the only place we can even speak to some of these people.
Patricia, you said it all, probably without realizing it. “Speak to some of these people” – to be ignored or be delivered the same old eBayspeak after you ask a question or voice a concern does no one any good.
When I ask a question – it is because I want and or need an answer. It isn’t to be ignored and or censored.
Even in announcements that scream bad news for eBay members, Richard comes on here and spreads his happy, happy, joy, joy message about the news. I know this is his job. But, we were told when the blog began that part of the purpose of the blog was for us to get answers. I have gotten NO answers here to any of my questions (once Richard did offer to help me but I got the problem remedied behind the scenes several days afte the problem was not suppose to be happening). Other than that – asking questions on this blog have been less productive than asking my teen-age son to take out the garbage (that is like pulling teeth times 10!).
I don’t appreciate the censorship when there is absolutely no reason for it. Others have been less careful with language in their posts and etc than I have yet I am censored. I do not get it and I wish those that are doing the censoring would stop it. My family members did not go to war in most wars from WWII to Iraq and serve our country for the likes of eBay or anyone else to take away my freedoms.
I understand this is THEIR blog but then why do they invite us to use it and present it as something it is not if they are going to ignore and censor us?
The false hopes, empty promises, and double speak provided by eBay are not exclusive the auction site, that’s for sure. I am sadly disappointed but not surprised that they feel my questions and concerns mean so little to them that they pay no attention to them.
camOn August 22, 2008 at 3:06 am Said:
I’m a bit different than most posting. I never, ever, want to take anything BUT Paypal. 20% of my transactions end up with a buyer that emails me for my address, even thought I specify PAYPAL ONLY. Because of DSRs, I’ve had to bend over and take these “paper payments”. So, when this came out..I was really happy, I HATE processing checks.
Now, I read on the website comments from eBay:
We realize that some customers may ask to pay with a check or money order. While we prefer buyers pay with online payments, it is fine for sellers to accept checks or money orders upon the buyers request.
So, it is no different from me, EXCEPT, now if I do what the buyer asks, its “okay”, but I can get suspended.
Come on. Either its allowed or its not. Don’t make me be the bad guy with the buyers, say “no” and get low DSRs or say “yes” and get suspended.
ROCK [me] HARD PLACE
This is SO WRONG !!!
-CAM
JayOn August 22, 2008 at 5:47 am Said:
Cam, if you get a negative feedback because they want to pay with a money order/check, the feedback will be removed.
No rock. No hard place. Also, buyers will be informed via email of this change.
JayOn August 22, 2008 at 5:49 am Said:
As for buyers going ‘elsewhere’ on the internet to pay with a money order for their items…
Aside from Craigslist, where else can they go that accepts money orders?
LaurieOn August 22, 2008 at 5:56 am Said:
Usher,
I have a question about search.
Currently if a seller has identical items listed then only one of those items will show up in search.
What happens if I have identical items listed- one as an auction and one as fixed price. Will they both show up in search or will only one?
EricOn August 22, 2008 at 6:41 am Said:
@JAY
Amazon.com, Buy.com and most major ecommerce sites do accept check and money orders.
LaurieOn August 22, 2008 at 7:25 am Said:
There is a RUMOR that Amazon is also doing away with checks/mo- I don’t know if it is true, but it is being discussed on the Amazon boards and many blogs.
Will have to wait and see if that is true.
JayOn August 22, 2008 at 7:29 am Said:
See, with Amazon, I don’t think I’ve ever bought a product from a ’seller’ which is why I personally don’t sell there.
Also why I didn’t know they allowed money orders because the site itself doesn’t offer money orders or checks for their items, but I suppose sellers there are allowed to.
I know Walmart.com, Bestbuy.com, CircuitCity.com, TigerDirect.com, and Woot.com (the most common places I buy online) don’t offer check or money order as an option. Especially mail in.
I’m just amazed that money orders even exist. All the labor to get one, the fee to buy one, the liability if it’s lost, the lack of protection if the item doesn’t arrive.
How do you refund a customer who pays with a money order? A mailed out check?
That all just sounds more time consuming than its worth – just my 2 cents.
DavidOn August 22, 2008 at 9:09 am Said:
Anybody have any thoughts on the newest rounds of EPN affiliates being expired?
DakotaOn August 22, 2008 at 9:44 am Said:
Usher
I would appreciate an answer to CAM’s post above.
It is basically the same as the question I asked but has not been allowed to post on this blog.
Would you please answer it?
ChrisOn August 22, 2008 at 10:07 am Said:
In the UK Amazon will stop accepting cheques and money orders from 9th September. As I have used cheques in the past, I had an email a few days ago from Amazon notifying me of this. Ironically it was the reason I first used them, when I first started buying online and wasn’t sure about the security of paying online.
TonyOn August 22, 2008 at 10:35 am Said:
I’m surprised they didn’t try the no cheques rule in the UK first Chris. Many places are phasing out cheques, I was in a high street store today who had a sign up saying they stopped accepting personal cheques on August 1st.
However there is still a market for people who want to accept cheques and I think ebay should let the market speak rather than twisting arms, it would be different if ebay themselves decided they won’t accept cheques, that’s their choice but I don’t think they should force that upon sellers.
DavidOn August 22, 2008 at 12:05 pm Said:
John,
Seller’s central forum if filled with seller’s that have gotten negative feedback from a NPB and not removed. Also strikes for NPB are being dropped.
DavidOn August 22, 2008 at 12:11 pm Said:
John,
Also forgot to add that reports to eBay are not followed through. I have reported several Chinese sellers in the past for selling FAKE GOLD jewelry and NO action was taken as they sell a TON of that FAKE stuff. They were selling NEW jewelry way below scrap gold. Enough so that if it was real I would have bought every one of their items and scrapped them and made money! Until eBay does what they say and cleans up the site, supports sellers (your customers by the way), drops the current feedback rules, listens to people, and stop making STUPID decisions they will continue the downward spiral of the site.
TonyOn August 22, 2008 at 12:13 pm Said:
John a lot of sellers don’t report bad buyer behaviour because of policies like this:
“Feedback extortion is not a reason for feedback removal under eBay’s Feedback Withdrawal and Removal Policy. It is possible to threaten negative feedback, but still leave a valid comment.”
LurchOn August 22, 2008 at 12:20 pm Said:
John-
Will DSR’s also be removed or will they remain and potentially contribute to a seller’s inability to sell (particularly if a low-volume seller)?
TheBrewsNewsOn August 22, 2008 at 12:31 pm Said:
@Tony
The issue of feedback extortion is an important issue to me.
I received confirmation today from eBay that the wording in outgoing emails to sellers who report possible feedback extortion has been changed so that it no longer says feedback will not be removed.
I am working on a blog post specifically about feedback extortion, a topic on which I have traded numerous emails over the last week with a few eBay employees.
I am hoping to have the Feedback Extortion blog post up sometime in the next few days.
AmberOn August 22, 2008 at 1:07 pm Said:
I have yet to see anyone address this in the numerous places I’ve posted both on the announcement forum and on the Seller Central discussion board.
The only way eBay will be able to determine abuse of the payments policy is by monitoring checkout completion rates.
My checkout completion rates will be artificially low, as I frequently have to use Paypal invoices for my buyers. The checkout quite simply doesn’t do the job.
It doesn’t allow me to discount more than the shipping amount nor will it allow a combined payment for items purchased on multiple ebay sites: I sell directly on ebay au and buyers frequently will buy 2 books from Au, 2 from .com In order to pay only 1 transaction fee, I invoice.
Almost all transactions are with approved methods, but I can easily see my account being flagged for excessive checkout abandonment.
No one will address a fix for this issue nor will they address what the threshold is for sanctions. Lastly, they will not/have not addressed if we will be able to appeal if we can, like I can, prove the payments were done through an approved method.
DakotaOn August 22, 2008 at 1:59 pm Said:
I just sent John Mc a message through posting on this blog and guess what?
It has NOT posted!
WHY?!
Papa eBay is really messing with me and I deserve to know why!
CAMOn August 22, 2008 at 2:22 pm Said:
@Jay – I don’t care about feedback. Its the DSRs and I would have no idea if they left a bad DSR because I wouldn’t accept a check.
I could care less about feedback at this point (100%), its the DSRs that detemine if any of my items are EVER seen.
-CAM
camOn August 22, 2008 at 2:27 pm Said:
John,
What about DSRs? I don’t care about feedback. My concern is that if I do not take checks and money orders “by request” that I will be hosed. I mean, it really is at least 20% of my transations today and I specify Paypal only.
-CAM
CAMOn August 22, 2008 at 2:34 pm Said:
I must have a short attention span today. As soon as I hit submit, I have another thought.
John, I am probably a “bad” seller. I’ve never left a negative feedback for a buyer. If they don’t pay me, I just file mutual withdrawl and move on. I’ve never reported a buyer for anything.
I don’t have the angst that others do about “bad” buyers. I’ve run into wacko’s and I just let it roll off my back. So, I won’t be reporting any buyers for anything. I like buyers, and some are so angst ridden at having a previous bad transaction, they just need reassurance.
I KNOW I have an unpopular opinion but I’m not about to ruin a buyer by reporting them to you cause they are short-tempered, uninfomed or demanding.
Life is too short to worry about what others are doing and its not my job :)
-CAM
Patricia1On August 22, 2008 at 2:38 pm Said:
@ Mr. McDonald:
“We also realize that many sellers will decide to comply with the buyer’s request and accept payment by check and money order. As long as this occurs for a reasonably small percentage of transactions for the seller (eBay doesn’t see a pattern of abuse of the accepted payments policy), we won’t take any action against the seller.”
ACTION AGAINST THE SELLER??? May I ask just what ebay intends to do to punish a seller who is merely trying to accomodate his buyer and complete a sale? Is the fee Paypal collects is so valuable to you people that you will turn away valid buyers who do not want to put their credit information online? Or who has a low income and saves to purchase an item? Frankly, I find this a low blow and appalling!…and to hold a seller responsible makes it even worse!
Patricia1On August 22, 2008 at 4:24 pm Said:
Cam’s post brought something to memory. I have heard that a 4.25 in ANY one of the DSR stars will get a seller suspended. Is this true? …AND is ebay still telling buyers that a 4.0 is okay?????
Patricia1On August 22, 2008 at 4:27 pm Said:
What I think all of this boils down to is we need CORRECT straightforward information and we need ebay to STOP telling sellers one thing and buyers something else! We need FAIRNESS so we have an environment we can work in! I don’t believe that’s asking too much. Most sellers feel EBAY is the major obstacle standing in the way of their business and their sales. Its a point you folks may want to think about.
TonyOn August 22, 2008 at 4:39 pm Said:
DSR ratings are quite simply a disgrace, it’s something ebay should be embarrassed about, they’re hokum, balderdash and absurdity all rolled into one.
They will never ever be accurate.
I live in the UK and this weekend we’ll have soccer and everyone will have a different opinion on how players played, and that’s what DSR’s are, opinions. They are not a sesnible benchmark.
One day ebay will grow up and realise this, I hope it’s sooner rather than later.
DakotaOn August 22, 2008 at 5:19 pm Said:
Patricia,
The new policy states that sellers must carry at least 4.3 across the board – which I think means that 4.299 or less will get them the boot.
And all of this is decided by unverified, and mostly uninformed members.
Crazy!
We close the comments for posts after 30 days. If you would still like to comment on this post, please use our contact form.
119 Responses on this post. Click to add yours.